6/4/2023 0 Comments Proloquo assistve device![]() ![]() It was good for sentence development concept, but not for functional communication. His vocabulary was well beyond 200 hundred words and we had a notebook with all of those symbols, but it took a lot for me to manage it for his access and I couldn't do it all the time. This is not effective or efficient, yet that is what we were asked to do at home. He could use PECS in very structured speech setting where the pictures could be in predictable locations, but when they weren't he couldn't spend 30 minutes scanning hundreds of pictures to say one thing to make a request. ![]() He was effective and successful with that, but no one was interested in finding a VOD for him. Prior to exploring PECS, he had an AlphaTalker and it died. He has a vision impairment, but staff insisted for years that he could use PECS. I have been working with students with complex needs for 25 years in public school in addition to having a son with complex communication needs (vision and hearing impairments). social interaction? Or is the need for voice output related more to communication environments… or our own preferences? How ‘fluid’ are we in considering these factors? Do we rely on subjective opinions in recommending various tools or do we make “data based decisions”? I am looking forward to hearing how this community thinks about AAC and what considerations are felt to be most crucial to successful outcomes for individuals with complex motor and communication challenges. environmental demands? When do we “need” voice output? Is the need for voice output related to communicative functions - requesting vs. When and to what extent is the decision regarding “best AAC for an individual” determined by the “horse we ride” vs. I am always interested in what factors influence our final decisions and recommendations regarding tools and strategies. While Assistive Technology can offer so many amazing tools to support these individuals, the success of the technology (light or high technology) is directly related to ‘our’ ability to match the technology to individual abilities, needs and interests. My passion is about finding AAC solutions and supports for individuals with complex motor and communication needs. ![]() I have also enjoyed being a part of the Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology (QIAT) Leadership as well as a member of the QIAT Community. I am a co-author of Every Move Counts: a sensory based approach to communication (emc) and Every Move Counts, Clicks and Chats: A sensory based approach to communication and assistive technology (emc3). I have worked with Assistive Technology in the public schools, assisted living settings, clinics and private practice. Hello! My name is Jane Korsten and I am a Speech/Language Pathologist from the Kansas City Area. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |